James McClung

A fabricated professional identity used in the DPRK remote IT-worker scheme. Everything below is transcribed from the cited post, in which a named researcher attributes these accounts to a single operator, James McClung. The attribution is theirs, not this site's.

IT Worker Fraud First reported 2025-04-18

Profiles and evidence

Identifiers attributed to this persona

2 indicators the source attributes to this operator, each with its sources.

IndicatorTypeAccount status
James McClung alias —
188.43.253.77 ip address —

James McClung

alias IT Worker Fraud RESEARCHER POST

First seen 2025-04-18 · last seen 2025-04-18

Source

  • The researcher names this as the identity a DPRK IT worker interviews under, claiming Alvin, Texas, and reads the portrait as AI-generated. The post describes the name as a stolen identity, so somewhere there is a real person who carries it and is not accused of anything; it is recorded here because the name is what an interviewer is handed and the entry says plainly whose claim it is and that the identity is stolen. The operator connected from the same Russian address as a second identity the post names.
    x.com/browsercookies/status/1913298431738888490 — Cookie Connoisseur (@browsercookies) · under “James McClung” · published 2025-04-18 · pulled 2026-08-30

188.43.253.77

ip address IT Worker Fraud MATCHED IN SOURCE

Also listed under Ondriah Young — this value’s page names all of them.

First seen 2025-04-18 · last seen 2025-05-08

Network

Kindfixed line
NetworkTRANS-TELECOM
Announced byAS20485 Joint Stock Company TransTeleCom
CountryRussia

Looked up 2026-09-21 at ip-api.com. A subscriber line, as a person working from home ordinarily has.

Sources

  • The researcher names this as the identity a DPRK IT worker interviews under, claiming Alvin, Texas, and reads the portrait as AI-generated. The post describes the name as a stolen identity, so somewhere there is a real person who carries it and is not accused of anything; it is recorded here because the name is what an interviewer is handed and the entry says plainly whose claim it is and that the identity is stolen. The operator connected from the same Russian address as a second identity the post names.
    x.com/browsercookies/status/1913298431738888490 — Cookie Connoisseur (@browsercookies) · under “James McClung” · published 2025-04-18 · pulled 2026-08-30
  • The second identity the post names, described as an IT worker connecting from the same Russian address as the James McClung identity. That shared address is the whole of what links them and is the only value the post gives for this name.
    x.com/browsercookies/status/1913298431738888490 — Cookie Connoisseur (@browsercookies) · under “Ondriah Young” · published 2025-04-18 · pulled 2026-08-30
  • The researcher states that two IT-worker personas it was tracking connected from this same Russian address, which is what ties them to one another. The post attaches an AI-generated profile photograph and describes the identity behind it as stolen, so the name it gives is recorded in the held-back list rather than published as a persona here.
    x.com/browsercookies/status/1913298431738888490 — Cookie Connoisseur (@browsercookies) · under “Address shared between two IT-worker personas” · published 2025-04-18 · pulled 2026-08-30
  • …campaign; many are geo-located in Khabarovsk, Russia: 80.237.84.12 80.237.87.21 83.234.227.33-8 188.43.33.252 188.43.136.41,115 188.43.253.77 China Unicom ISP China remains North Korea’s most critical ally, providing political support, economic aid, and diplomatic backing.…
    Threat Spotlight: Red Flags for Red Star Hackers: Hunting for North Korean Insiders - ReliaQuest — ReliaQuest · under “Russian TTK ISP” · published 2025-05-08 · pulled 2026-09-01

Sources

Back to all personas

Disclaimer An entry here is not proof of DPRK affiliation or wrongdoing. A listed name, account or address may belong to an uninvolved person, so each entry is a lead to verify independently. What inclusion means. James McClung as the name of the operator is the cited researcher’s assertion, repeated here as their claim.