Rex Blank

A profile a reviewer opened and left under review. It matches screening signals of DPRK IT-worker personas; no connection to those operations is stated.

Statusunder review
Confidencemedium
Profile
Account created2024-05
Network
0 followers
Claims 1 employer
Verificationsnone
Line type N/A — none published
Photograph NOT A PHOTO
a dark circular badge carrying a bird device and the words DARK and AGENCY; an agency logo rather than a face
SignalsAccount age vs claimSecond account, same nameSmall networkSparse history
Surfaced byQuoted LinkedIn people search on the name displayed by an existing candidate
Found byLinkedIn people search, the displayed name IN QUOTATION MARKS
First seen2026-09-16
Last checked2026-09-16

Indicators

Indexed in the Remote Workers search, each with its own page:

Review

Found on 16 September 2026 by searching LinkedIn for the name rex-blank-4b5ab8361 displays, in quotation marks, and read under an authenticated session the same day. The search returned two accounts called Rex Blank and nothing else. This is the second. It joined LinkedIn in MAY 2024, has no verifications, no followers at all, no About section, no experience section, no education section and no posts, and its only content is a headline: Chief Executive Officer at Darkstoneagency, Chemnitz, Saxony, Germany. Its avatar is an agency logo rather than a face. Darkstoneagency has no LinkedIn company page, no other member claims it, and a site-wide search for the word returns nobody, so it is an employer name the account typed rather than an organisation anything else knows about. What makes the pair worth a row rather than a footnote is that Rex Blank is not a name that recurs. Two accounts hold it and no third person on LinkedIn does. One was made in May 2024 and says it runs a German agency that does not exist; the other was made in April 2025 and claims, from New York, four years as a DeFi chief technology officer, multisig authority over a treasury and incident response on the Scream Finance and Sonne Finance exploits, against two connections. Neither has any content a real career leaves behind. Nothing here is corroborated by a cited report, and neither account shares an indicator with any persona this site holds, so the pairing is a pairing and not an attribution. Under review, not confirmed.

Sources

Unconfirmed lead under review An entry here is not proof of DPRK affiliation or wrongdoing. A listed name, account or address may belong to an uninvolved person, so each entry is a lead to verify independently. What inclusion means. The heading is the name or account the profile presents under, not established to be the name of whoever operates it. The confidence is this site’s own screening score, not a source’s. If this entry concerns you, see the guidance for listed people.