https://github.com/collaborate3562

https://github.com/collaborate3562 is a GitHub account that one published source reports in connection with Contagious Interview activity, which public reporting attributes to North Korea (DPRK). It is cited here from Silent Push. The report is dated 2025-04-24.

github profile Contagious Interview MATCHED IN SOURCE live checked 2026-09-18

Listed as collaborate3562

First seen 2025-04-24 · last seen 2025-04-24

Source

  • …In total, we confirmed 9 GitHub repos spreading the backdoor: github.com/Collaborate3562/ncipher-backend github.com/Paragkoche/ncipher1.2upgrade-backend-2 github.com/TopStar720/nyx4 github.com/asimhafeezz/blacknovas-test github.com/hrjaffer…
    Silent Push uncovered Contagious Interview front company scam — Silent Push · under “Investigating BlockNovas’ GitHub Infrastructure” · published 2025-04-24 · pulled 2026-09-12

Find this indicator in the index, or see every GitHub account this site holds under GitHub accounts in the browse listing.

Account analysis

Account created2021-12-07
Repositories78 original, 1 forked
History older than the account3 repositories: Collaborate3562/Homora-bank (first commit 2020-11-20), Collaborate3562/Svelte-Strapi (first commit 2020-10-23), Collaborate3562/Staking-farming (first commit 2021-09-25)
Commits copied into others' repositories0
Commit identities0 addresses, 0 names
Name then four digitscollaborate3562

From gh-fake-analyzer 1.0.2, the Ketman Project's GitHub analysis tool, run on 2026-11-02. These are signals: backdated history and several commit identities are common among ordinary developers too, and an account that shows none of them is not thereby cleared.

Related indicators

Cited by the same report: Silent Push uncovered Contagious Interview front company scam

Silent Push lists 88 other indicators in this source. 12 are shown, chosen across types.

All 89 indicators from this source

Disclaimer An entry here is not proof of DPRK affiliation or wrongdoing. A listed name, account or address may belong to an uninvolved person, so each entry is a lead to verify independently. What inclusion means. See the sourcing methodology.